Failure rate modeling using fault tree analysis and Bayesian network: DEMO pulsed operation turbine study case

Danilo Nicola Dongiovanni, Tomas Iesmantas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Availability will play an important role in the Demonstration Power Plant (DEMO) success from an economic and safety perspective. Availability performance is commonly assessed by Reliability Availability Maintainability Inspectability (RAMI) analysis, strongly relying on the accurate definition of system components failure modes (FM) and failure rates (FR). Little component experience is available in fusion application, therefore requiring the adaptation of literature FR to fusion plant operating conditions, which may differ in several aspects. As a possible solution to this problem, a new methodology to extrapolate/estimate components failure rate under different operating conditions is presented. The DEMO Balance of Plant nuclear steam turbine component operated in pulse mode is considered as study case. The methodology moves from the definition of a fault tree taking into account failure modes possibly enhanced by pulsed operation. The fault tree is then translated into a Bayesian network. A statistical model for the turbine system failure rate in terms of subcomponents’ FR is hence obtained, allowing for sensitivity analyses on the structured mixture of literature and unknown FR data for which plausible value intervals are investigated to assess their impact on the whole turbine system FR. Finally, the impact of resulting turbine system FR on plant availability is assessed exploiting a Reliability Block Diagram (RBD) model for a typical secondary cooling system implementing a Rankine cycle. Mean inherent availability for a period of 20 years plant mission range from 79% to 82% when varying turbine subcomponents FR from 1E-4/h to 1E-8/h, respectively, and much lower than the 97% performance expected for steady state operation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)613 - 617
Number of pages5
JournalFusion Engineering and Design
Volume109-111
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016
Externally publishedYes

    Fingerprint

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this